

Dear Creative,
For the last few years, the relationship between AI developers and the creative industries has been defined by a single, volatile word: Theft. But as we settle into 2026, the narrative is shifting rapidly. We are moving from a "wild west" of unrestricted data scraping to a new era of high-stakes litigation, billion-dollar settlements, and—finally—infrastructure for paying creators.
Here is how the landscape is changing:
1. The Revolt: "Stealing Isn't Innovation"

The tension reached a boiling point this January when over 800 prominent artists signed an open letter accusing tech companies of infringing on copyrighted works to build their AI platforms 1. The signatories include heavyweights like Scarlett Johansson, Cate Blanchett, and Vince Gilligan (creator of Breaking Bad), alongside musical acts like R.E.M. 2.
Released under the banner of the Human Artistry Campaign, the letter’s message was blunt: "Stealing our work is not innovation. It's not progress. It's theft – plain and simple" 3. This wasn't just a complaint; it was a unified warning from the creative class that the "move fast and break things" approach to training data is no longer acceptable 4.
2. The Litigation: From Theory to Billion-Dollar Reality
While artists protest, the courts are busy. As of early 2026, there are approximately 60 active copyright-related lawsuits against AI companies in the U.S. alone.
The legal arguments are becoming increasingly granular. In the high-profile New York Times v. OpenAI case, researchers have focused on "verbatim memorization"—the tendency of large models to regurgitate exact passages of training data, which undercuts the "fair use" defense 5.

But the biggest wake-up call came in late 2025 with the $1.5 billion settlement in Bartz v. Anthropic 6. Facing massive statutory damages for using pirated books from the "Books3" dataset to train its models, Anthropic agreed to pay approximately $3,000 per infringed work. This settlement set a hard price tag on data negligence and signaled to investors that the liability for "dirty data" is real and expensive.
3. The Pivot: Microsoft’s "Publisher Content Marketplace"
In what might be the most significant shift of the year, Microsoft has effectively admitted that the era of free scraping is ending.
On February 3, 2026, Microsoft Advertising unveiled the Publisher Content Marketplace (PCM) 7. This new platform is designed to facilitate a direct value exchange: AI developers pay publishers for the right to use their content to "ground" AI responses, and publishers receive usage-based payments.

• How it works: Instead of a black box, publishers define licensing terms and receive reports on how their content is generating value within AI products like Copilot.
• The Partners: The pilot includes major players like The Associated Press, Condé Nast, Hearst, and Vox Media.
• The Signal: By building a marketplace for "premium content," Microsoft is betting that high-quality, licensed data will be the differentiator for the next generation of "agentic" AI. They have reportedly told publishers, "You deserve to be paid on the quality of your IP" 8.

4. The Independent Path: A "Reset" for Creators
While Microsoft builds infrastructure for media giants, independent creators are finding their own ways to navigate this new reality.
In a recent interview, J. Classic Maestro described the current moment as a necessary "personal recalibration" for artists 9. While traditional gatekeepers fight over licensing fees, he argues that the Web3 frontier offers a "reset" from centralized control.
By releasing his latest visual narrative, One More Time, on decentralized platforms like Creative TV, J. Classic is bypassing the AI scraping dilemma entirely. His approach highlights a parallel trend: while corporations build walled gardens for data, individual creators are using blockchain technology to ensure direct community engagement and ownership.
The Bottom Line
We are witnessing the industrialization of AI data. The "free tier" of the internet is closing. Whether through Microsoft’s corporate marketplace or J. Classic’s decentralized ecosystem, the future of creativity in 2026 is defined by provenance, ownership, and payment.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stay tuned for Part 2, where we will dive into the "Orange Economy" and how governments are reclassifying entertainment as essential industrial policy.
Inbox.lv, "Theft"! Scarlett Johansson and Cate Blanchett Among 800 Artists Who Opposed AI. 22 January 2026. https://news.inbox.lv/14zrlvk-theft-scarlett-johansson-and-cate-blanchett-among-800-artists-who-opposed-ai?language=en
↩Irvine Times, Scarlett Johansson accuses tech companies of ‘theft’ to train AI. 22 January 2026. https://www.irvinetimes.com/leisure/national/25787891.scarlett-johansson-accuses-tech-companies-theft-train-ai/
↩Gamesradar.com, Scarlett Johansson, Kristen Bell, and Vince Gilligan among 700 Hollywood creatives behind anti-AI campaign: "Stealing our work is not innovation". 23 January 2026. https://www.gamesradar.com/entertainment/drama-movies/scarlett-johansson-kristen-bell-and-vince-gilligan-among-700-hollywood-creatives-behind-anti-ai-campaign-stealing-our-work-is-not-innovation/
↩The Guardian, Scarlett Johansson and Cate Blanchett back campaign accusing AI firms of theft. 22 January 2026. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jan/22/scarlett-johansson-and-cate-blanchett-back-campaign-accusing-ai-firms-of-theft
↩Dear Creative,
For the last few years, the relationship between AI developers and the creative industries has been defined by a single, volatile word: Theft. But as we settle into 2026, the narrative is shifting rapidly. We are moving from a "wild west" of unrestricted data scraping to a new era of high-stakes litigation, billion-dollar settlements, and—finally—infrastructure for paying creators.
Here is how the landscape is changing:
1. The Revolt: "Stealing Isn't Innovation"

The tension reached a boiling point this January when over 800 prominent artists signed an open letter accusing tech companies of infringing on copyrighted works to build their AI platforms 1. The signatories include heavyweights like Scarlett Johansson, Cate Blanchett, and Vince Gilligan (creator of Breaking Bad), alongside musical acts like R.E.M. 2.
Released under the banner of the Human Artistry Campaign, the letter’s message was blunt: "Stealing our work is not innovation. It's not progress. It's theft – plain and simple" 3. This wasn't just a complaint; it was a unified warning from the creative class that the "move fast and break things" approach to training data is no longer acceptable 4.
2. The Litigation: From Theory to Billion-Dollar Reality
While artists protest, the courts are busy. As of early 2026, there are approximately 60 active copyright-related lawsuits against AI companies in the U.S. alone.
The legal arguments are becoming increasingly granular. In the high-profile New York Times v. OpenAI case, researchers have focused on "verbatim memorization"—the tendency of large models to regurgitate exact passages of training data, which undercuts the "fair use" defense 5.

But the biggest wake-up call came in late 2025 with the $1.5 billion settlement in Bartz v. Anthropic 6. Facing massive statutory damages for using pirated books from the "Books3" dataset to train its models, Anthropic agreed to pay approximately $3,000 per infringed work. This settlement set a hard price tag on data negligence and signaled to investors that the liability for "dirty data" is real and expensive.
3. The Pivot: Microsoft’s "Publisher Content Marketplace"
In what might be the most significant shift of the year, Microsoft has effectively admitted that the era of free scraping is ending.
On February 3, 2026, Microsoft Advertising unveiled the Publisher Content Marketplace (PCM) 7. This new platform is designed to facilitate a direct value exchange: AI developers pay publishers for the right to use their content to "ground" AI responses, and publishers receive usage-based payments.

• How it works: Instead of a black box, publishers define licensing terms and receive reports on how their content is generating value within AI products like Copilot.
• The Partners: The pilot includes major players like The Associated Press, Condé Nast, Hearst, and Vox Media.
• The Signal: By building a marketplace for "premium content," Microsoft is betting that high-quality, licensed data will be the differentiator for the next generation of "agentic" AI. They have reportedly told publishers, "You deserve to be paid on the quality of your IP" 8.

4. The Independent Path: A "Reset" for Creators
While Microsoft builds infrastructure for media giants, independent creators are finding their own ways to navigate this new reality.
In a recent interview, J. Classic Maestro described the current moment as a necessary "personal recalibration" for artists 9. While traditional gatekeepers fight over licensing fees, he argues that the Web3 frontier offers a "reset" from centralized control.
By releasing his latest visual narrative, One More Time, on decentralized platforms like Creative TV, J. Classic is bypassing the AI scraping dilemma entirely. His approach highlights a parallel trend: while corporations build walled gardens for data, individual creators are using blockchain technology to ensure direct community engagement and ownership.
The Bottom Line
We are witnessing the industrialization of AI data. The "free tier" of the internet is closing. Whether through Microsoft’s corporate marketplace or J. Classic’s decentralized ecosystem, the future of creativity in 2026 is defined by provenance, ownership, and payment.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stay tuned for Part 2, where we will dive into the "Orange Economy" and how governments are reclassifying entertainment as essential industrial policy.
Inbox.lv, "Theft"! Scarlett Johansson and Cate Blanchett Among 800 Artists Who Opposed AI. 22 January 2026. https://news.inbox.lv/14zrlvk-theft-scarlett-johansson-and-cate-blanchett-among-800-artists-who-opposed-ai?language=en
↩Irvine Times, Scarlett Johansson accuses tech companies of ‘theft’ to train AI. 22 January 2026. https://www.irvinetimes.com/leisure/national/25787891.scarlett-johansson-accuses-tech-companies-theft-train-ai/
↩Gamesradar.com, Scarlett Johansson, Kristen Bell, and Vince Gilligan among 700 Hollywood creatives behind anti-AI campaign: "Stealing our work is not innovation". 23 January 2026. https://www.gamesradar.com/entertainment/drama-movies/scarlett-johansson-kristen-bell-and-vince-gilligan-among-700-hollywood-creatives-behind-anti-ai-campaign-stealing-our-work-is-not-innovation/
↩The Guardian, Scarlett Johansson and Cate Blanchett back campaign accusing AI firms of theft. 22 January 2026. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jan/22/scarlett-johansson-and-cate-blanchett-back-campaign-accusing-ai-firms-of-theft
↩Arxiv, Exploring Memorization and Copyright Violation in Frontier LLMs: A Study of the New York Times v. OpenAI 2023 Lawsuit. 9 December 2024. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.06370
↩Copyright Alliance, AI Copyright Lawsuit Developments in 2025: A Year in Review. 8 January 2026. https://copyrightalliance.org/ai-copyright-lawsuit-developments-2025/
↩Microsoft Advertisement, Building Toward a Sustainable Content Economy for the Agentic Web. 3 February 2026. https://about.ads.microsoft.com/en/blog/post/february-2026/building-toward-a-sustainable-content-economy-for-the-agentic-web
↩Search Engine World, Microsoft is preparing to launch a Publisher Content Marketplace (PCM). 20 September 2025. https://www.searchengineworld.com/microsoft-is-preparing-to-launch-a-publisher-content-marketplace-pcm
↩Dear Creative, The Architecture of Resilience: A Cinematic Reset. 14 February 2026. https://news.creativeplatform.xyz/a-cinematic-reset
↩Arxiv, Exploring Memorization and Copyright Violation in Frontier LLMs: A Study of the New York Times v. OpenAI 2023 Lawsuit. 9 December 2024. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.06370
↩Copyright Alliance, AI Copyright Lawsuit Developments in 2025: A Year in Review. 8 January 2026. https://copyrightalliance.org/ai-copyright-lawsuit-developments-2025/
↩Microsoft Advertisement, Building Toward a Sustainable Content Economy for the Agentic Web. 3 February 2026. https://about.ads.microsoft.com/en/blog/post/february-2026/building-toward-a-sustainable-content-economy-for-the-agentic-web
↩Search Engine World, Microsoft is preparing to launch a Publisher Content Marketplace (PCM). 20 September 2025. https://www.searchengineworld.com/microsoft-is-preparing-to-launch-a-publisher-content-marketplace-pcm
↩Dear Creative, The Architecture of Resilience: A Cinematic Reset. 14 February 2026. https://news.creativeplatform.xyz/a-cinematic-reset
↩>400 subscribers
>400 subscribers
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
2 comments
BREAKING: The relationship between AI and copyright is "very, very complex," per Union Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw at this week's AI Impact Summit. Part 1 of our #StateOfCreativity series is OUT now. 🧵 Key findings:
• The $1.5B settlement setting a price tag on "dirty data." • Microsoft Advertising’s end to the "free scraping" era. • Why 2026 is the year we regain creative control. Get the full scoop: https://news.creativeplatform.xyz/data-wars-and-the-new-pay-for-content-era